Estate of Timken v. United States
District Court, N.D. Ohio
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OF OPINION AND ORDER
[RESOLVING DOCS. 15 and 16]
JOHN R. ADAMS, District Judge.
In this tax refund case, the plaintiffs 1 seek a refund of over $4 million in genera tion-skipping transfer (“GST”) tax plus statutory interest. Plaintiffs’ entitlement to the refund turns on whether Treasury Regulation § 26.2601-1(b)(1)(v)(A), the constructive additions Regulation (the “Regulation”), 2 is valid; and, if the Regulation is valid, whether it applies to the facts in this case. Through their cross-motions for Summary Judgment (Docs. 15 and 16), which are presently before the Court, the parties…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Adickes v. S. H. Kress & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1970
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Estate of Timken v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2010