Legal Opinion

Estate of Timken v. United States

District Court, N.D. Ohio

Decided March 25, 2009No. Case 5:04CV1188PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OF OPINION AND ORDER

[RESOLVING DOCS. 15 and 16]

JOHN R. ADAMS, District Judge.

In this tax refund case, the plaintiffs 1 seek a refund of over $4 million in genera tion-skipping transfer (“GST”) tax plus statutory interest. Plaintiffs’ entitlement to the refund turns on whether Treasury Regulation § 26.2601-1(b)(1)(v)(A), the constructive additions Regulation (the “Regulation”), 2 is valid; and, if the Regulation is valid, whether it applies to the facts in this case. Through their cross-motions for Summary Judgment (Docs. 15 and 16), which are presently before the Court, the parties…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  4. Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
  5. Adickes v. S. H. Kress & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1970

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Estate of Timken v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2010

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API