Legal Opinion

Ryan v. Berger

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided December 2, 1949PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBrown, J.

Plaintiffs submit that the complaint states a cause of action for the recovery of a gratuitous conditional deposit made by plaintiffs for the benefit of defendants who are third-party beneficiaries so that defendants’ allegation that they did not agree to the conditions of the deposit is immaterial and constitutes no defense. Plaintiffs’ brief points out that the defendants did not deny that the deposit was without consideration.

Plaintiffs did not plead that the deposit was gratuitous and we do not think that such an intent can fairly be inferred from the language used. Neither did the…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Prime Manufacturing Co. v. A. F. Gallun & Sons Corp.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1938

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. De Bonville v. Travelers Insurance Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1959
  2. Venisek v. DraskiWisconsin Supreme Court · 1967
  3. Ondrejka v. OndrejkaWisconsin Supreme Court · 1958
  4. De Bonville v. Travelers Insurance Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1959
  5. Farmers Mutual Automobile Insurance v. Safeguard InsuranceWisconsin Supreme Court · 1960

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API