Legal Opinion

Ondrejka v. Ondrejka

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided June 3, 1958PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHallows, J.

The question involved is whether there are any substantial issues of fact to be tried. The plaintiff-appellant contends that there is no merit to the counterclaim because the respondent-defendant had knowledge of his wife’s membership in the Communist party and of her activities. The defendant contends that while he had knowledge of such membership and activities he did not know, and could not be expected to know, that they would interfere with the marital relationship and destroy the harmony of the family. The knowledge the respondent had at the time of marriage was of his wife’s prior…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Prime Manufacturing Co. v. A. F. Gallun & Sons Corp.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1938
  2. Krauss v. KraussSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1927
  3. Braun v. BraunWashington Supreme Court · 1948
  4. Batson v. NicholsWisconsin Supreme Court · 1951
  5. Fredrickson v. KabatWisconsin Supreme Court · 1951

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Voysey v. LabiskyWisconsin Supreme Court · 1960
  2. Jahns v. Milwaukee Mutual InsuranceWisconsin Supreme Court · 1968
  3. Skyline Construction, Inc. v. Sentry Realty, Inc.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1966
  4. Goelz v. City of MilwaukeeWisconsin Supreme Court · 1960
  5. Frew v. Dupons Construction Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1968

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API