Legal Opinion

Sacramento County Department of Health and Human Services v. N.Y.

California Court of Appeal

Decided July 11, 2012No. C070098PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

BLEASE, Acting P.

The mother (mother) appeals from the juvenile court’s order terminating her parental rights. (Welf. & Inst. Code, § 366.26.)1 Mother contends the order must be reversed because the Sacramento County Department of Health and Human Services (DHHS) did not make an adequate inquiry into the minor’s Indian ancestry as required by the Indian Child Welfare Act of 1978 (25 U.S.C. § 1901 et seq.; ICWA). We affirm.

*37BACKGROUND

We do not recite the facts underlying dependency jurisdiction and reunification efforts, as they are immaterial to the issues before us.

In June 2009, DHHS…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Mississippi Band of Choctaw Indians v. HolyfieldSupreme Court of the United States · 1989

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. In re C.E. CA3California Court of Appeal · 2020
  2. In re D.B. CA3California Court of Appeal · 2016
  3. In re J.A. CA3California Court of Appeal · 2015
  4. In re O.C. CA3California Court of Appeal · 2020
  5. In re Q.M.California Court of Appeal · 2022

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API