Lee v. Sterling Silk Manufacturing Co.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Appeal by the plaintiff, Robert E. Lee, from a judgment of the Supreme Court in favor of the defendant,' entered in the office of the clerk of the county of Kings on the 28th day of October, 1907, upon the verdict of a jury, and also from an order entered in said clerk’s office on the 30th day of November, 1907, denying the plaintiff’s motion for a new trial made upon the minutes.
1Opinion of the Court
Jenks, J.:
The first appeal herein is reported in 115 Appellate Division, 589. In the opinion I considered the various decisions pertinent, including those of our highest court, and I sought to deduce the rule as declared by that court. I adhere to the opinion therein expressed, *125and. for the treasons then given. I add only citation of Koester v. Rochester Candy Works (194 N. Y. 92, 95).
Upon this appeal it is urged that the learned court erred in dealing with the following request made by the plaintiff for an instruction: “I ask your honor to charge the jury that the employment of a boy under…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Hamilton v. . EnoNew York Court of Appeals · 1880
- Koester v. . Rochester Candy WorksNew York Court of Appeals · 1909
- Beglin v. . Metropolitan Life Ins. Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1903
- Lee v. Sterling Silk Manufacturing Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1906
- Zwack v. New York, Lake Erie & Western RailroadNew York Court of Appeals · 1899
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Boesel v. Wells Fargo & Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1914
- Dashinsky v. SantjerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1969
- Vincent v. Riggi & Sons, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1972
- Gifford v. Haynes Automobile Co.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1922