Legal Opinion

Kizziah v. United States

District Court, N.D. Alabama

Decided August 16, 2024No. 7:23-cv-08026Unknown

1Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ALABAMA WESTERN DIVISION CARL BILLY KIZZIAH, ] ] Movant, ] ] v. ] Case No.: 7:23-cv-8026-ACA ] UNITED STATES OF AMERICA ] ] Respondent. ] MEMORANDUM OPINION Carl Billy Kizziah moves, under 28 U.S.C. § 2255, to vacate, set aside, or correct his sentence. (Doc. 4). He contends that trial counsel provided ineffective assistance by (1) failing to file a notice of appeal (“Claim One”); (2) failing to object to a breach of the plea agreement (“Claim Two”); (3) failing to object to the length of the sentence (“Claim Three”); (4)…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Miller-El v. CockrellSupreme Court of the United States · 2003
  3. Roe v. Flores-OrtegaSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
  4. Scott v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  5. Alabama v. SheltonSupreme Court of the United States · 2002

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API