People v. Lawrence
New York Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Michael R. Juviler, J.
This is a decision on a motion to dismiss an indictment. The *753question treated here is whether a computer program in a "cloned” cellular telephone is a "written instrument” within the meaning of Penal Law § 170.00 (1) and therefore is a "forged instrument” whose possession with intent to defraud is criminal. (See, Penal Law § 170.00 [1], [7]; § 170.10 [1]; § 170.25.)
The question presented is of considerable importance because of the growing use of cloned cellular telephones in illegal enterprises, including trafficking in narcotics (see, Stone,…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Kyriacou v. KangelarisNassau County District Court · 1996
3Cited by7 opinions
- People v. RobinsonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2008
- JEM Marketing v. Cellular Telecommunications Industry Ass'nNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1998
- People v. OwensNew York Supreme Court · 2006
- People v. GrantNew York Supreme Court · 2000
- In re D.U.New York City Family Court · 2002
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.