Legal Opinion

People v. Lawrence

New York Supreme Court

Decided August 7, 1996PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

Michael R. Juviler, J.

This is a decision on a motion to dismiss an indictment. The *753question treated here is whether a computer program in a "cloned” cellular telephone is a "written instrument” within the meaning of Penal Law § 170.00 (1) and therefore is a "forged instrument” whose possession with intent to defraud is criminal. (See, Penal Law § 170.00 [1], [7]; § 170.10 [1]; § 170.25.)

The question presented is of considerable importance because of the growing use of cloned cellular telephones in illegal enterprises, including trafficking in narcotics (see, Stone,…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Kyriacou v. KangelarisNassau County District Court · 1996

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. People v. RobinsonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2008
  2. JEM Marketing v. Cellular Telecommunications Industry Ass'nNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1998
  3. People v. OwensNew York Supreme Court · 2006
  4. People v. GrantNew York Supreme Court · 2000
  5. In re D.U.New York City Family Court · 2002

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API