Legal Opinion

Laman v. Harrill

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided October 9, 1961No. 5-2472PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Neill Boi-ilinger, Associate Justice.

The appellee, who was plaintiff in the court below, contends that having taken the examination provided by the Civil Service Commission of North Little Rock and having been certified by said commission for a position as clerk, he is entitled to be employed in that position in place of another person who had not been certified by the commission, was not on its list of qualified persons, but had been placed in the position of clerk in the sanitation department by order of the mayor acting under an ordinance of the City of North Little Rock. The appellee then…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Little Rock v. North Little RockSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1904
  2. Simpson v. MatthewsSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1931
  3. State ex rel. Saltsman v. WeakleySupreme Court of Alabama · 1907
  4. Street Improvement Districts Nos. 481 & 485 v. HadfieldSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1931
  5. State Ex Rel. Burrow v. Jolly, County JudgeSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1944

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Boucher v. EngstromAlaska Supreme Court · 1974
  2. Littleton v. BlantonSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1984
  3. City of West Jordan v. Utah State Retirement BoardUtah Supreme Court · 1988
  4. Thomas v. FoustSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1969
  5. Knoop v. City of Little RockSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1982

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API