Legal Opinion

Simpson v. Matthews

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided July 13, 1931PublishedCited by 39 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHart, C. J.

This is an appeal from an order of the circuit court upholding the validity of a statute permitting adjoining landowners to form an improvement district and to condemn land adjacent to a State highway in order to construct a reservoir for the alleged protection thereof. No separate or particular statement of facts is necessary, for the reason that, on the consideration of the motion for a rehearing, the court has concluded that this case should he decided upon the single point whether the act is unconstitutional as being local or special act.

In construing article 5, § 25, of our Constitution,…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Nichols v. WalterSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1887
  2. State ex rel. Board of Courthouse & City Hall Com'rs v. CooleySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1893
  3. Webb v. AdamsSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1929
  4. State ex rel. Harris v. HerrmannSupreme Court of Missouri · 1882
  5. State ex rel. Anderson v. SullivanSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1898

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by39 opinions

  1. Littleton v. BlantonSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1984
  2. Shaw v. FoxCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1932
  3. State Ex Rel. Welsh v. DarlingSupreme Court of Iowa · 1933
  4. Leonard v. Luxora-Little River Road Maintenance District No. 1Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1933
  5. Albuquerque Metropolitan Arroyo Flood Control Authority v. SwinburneNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1964

34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API