Legal Opinion

Dixon v. State

Texas Supreme Court

Decided December 15, 1847PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Wheeleb

The appellant was convicted under the first section of the act of 1840 “to suppress gaming.” 4 Stat. 106. The jury fixed his punishment at imprisonment for one day, and a fine of fifty dollars. Whereupon he was committed to prison for one day, and until he should pay the amount of fine assessed by the jury.

Subsequently, the fine and costs not having been paid, the prisoner moved the court to discharge him from custody, which the court refused, and the prisoner appealed.

The act “punishing crimes and misdemeanors,” 1 Stat. 187, sec. 47, provides that “ For all fines assessed and costs of…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Lynde v. MontgomeryNew York Supreme Court · 1836

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Ex Parte MannCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1898
  2. Caulley v. CaulleyTexas Supreme Court · 1991
  3. Caulley v. CaulleyTexas Supreme Court · 1991
  4. Opinion No., Texas Attorney General Reports1984
  5. WhippleCalifornia Supreme Court · 1866

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API