Legal Opinion · Concurrence

Caulley v. Caulley

Texas Supreme Court

Decided April 24, 1991No. C-9274Published

1ConcurrenceMauzy, Justice

I concur with the majority’s decision to overrule Ruth Caulley’s Motion for Rehearing, but I write separately because of this Court’s failure to address Robert Caulley’s constitutional challenge to the turnover statute, Tex.Civ.Prac. & Rem.Code Ann. § 31.002.

In our original opinion, we held that the trial court’s order that Robert must turn over his wages to a receiver violated § 31.002(f) of the Texas Civil Practice and Remedies Code, which prohibits the turnover of proceeds of property exempt under any statute. See page 797-98. The majority of the Court did not find it necessary to address…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Beaumont Bank, N.A. v. BullerTexas Supreme Court · 1991
  2. Edgewood Independent School District v. KirbyTexas Supreme Court · 1989
  3. Markowsky v. NewmanTexas Supreme Court · 1940
  4. Ex Parte DavisTexas Supreme Court · 1908
  5. Oil Well Drilling Co. v. Associated Indemnity Corp.Texas Supreme Court · 1954

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API