Legal Opinion

United States v. E. Dillingham, Inc.

Court of Customs and Patent Appeals

Decided November 20, 1931No. 3432Published

1Opinion of the CourtHatfield, Judge

This is an appeal from a judgment of the United States Customs Court.

Certain imported cloth was assessed for duty by the collector at the port of Ogdensburg, N. Y., as “waterproof” cloth at 5 cents per square yard and 30 per centum ad valorem under paragraph 907 of the Tariff Act of 1922. The pertinent oart of the paragraph reads as follows:

Par. 907. * * * waterproof cloth composed wholly or in chief value of cotton or other vegetable fiber, whether or not in part of india rubber, 5 cents per square yard and 30 per centum ad valorem.

The importer protested, claiming that the cloth was not…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Krusi v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1911
  2. United States v. Burley & Tyrrell Co.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1914

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API