Jackson v. State
Alabama Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the CourtBricken, P. J.
From a judgment of conviction for a violation of the prohibition law this appeal was taken.
The principal insistence of error is based upon the refusal of the court to direct a verdict for defendant as requested in writing. The contention in the court below, and here, being made upon the grounds that the ■evidence in this case, failed to meet the burden resting upon the state, and that upon the whole evidence, as a matter of law, the defendant should have been acquitted.
This court has read the evidence adduced upon the trial, and has given it careful consideration. As a result we are…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Woodson v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1910
- Lee v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1922
- Anderson v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1922
3Cited by2 opinions
- Nixon & Phillips v. GrantSupreme Court of Alabama · 1929
- Smith v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1931