Lee v. State
Alabama Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the CourtBricken, P. J.
The indictment preferred against this defendant and presented by the grand jury in open court contained two counts. Count 1 charged, omitting the formal parts, that he distilled, made or manufactured alcoholic, spirituous, malted, or mixed liquors or beverages, a part of which was alcohol.
As the verdict was directed to count 1, there appears no. necessity of setting out count 2 of the indictment, nor of discussing such questions as relate solely to the second count, as the verdict of the jury operated as an acquittal of this defendant under that count.
Demurrers were overruled to the first…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Fonville v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1890
- Pellum v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1889
- Harrell v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1910
3Cited by21 opinions
- German v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1982
- Grimes v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1931
- Bufford v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1930
- Reeder v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1923
- Hinds v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1982
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.