Pallotta v. Aetna Insurance
New York Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtBernard S. Meyer, J.
This motion by plaintiff for summary judgment is granted to the extent of declaring that defendant, Empire Mutual Insurance Company is obligated to defend plaintiff in the two actions brought against him for personal injuries and wrongful death, and as to defendant Aetna, Insurance Company is denied without prejudice to renewal on papers including the Aetna policy.
It is not possible to determine on the present papers whether both carriers are, or only Empire is, obligated to defend. That both may be is clear from Everlast Sporting Goods Mfg. Co., v. Aetna Ins. Co. (23 A D 2d 641) but the only…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Arcara v. MoresseNew York Court of Appeals · 1932
- Wolpert v. GarrettAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1951
3Cited by3 opinions
- Gladstone v. D. W. Ritter Co.New York Supreme Court · 1986
- Mandell Corp. v. Insurance Co. of North AmericaNew York Supreme Court · 1984
- Builders Transport, Inc. v. Ford Motor Co.District Court, E.D. Texas · 1998