Legal Opinion

Hale v. Elkhorn Coal Corp.

Court of Appeals of Kentucky

Decided January 16, 1925PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion of the Court by

Judge Clarke

Affirming.

Prior to June 28, 1902, Ben Hale owned the fee in the tract of land here involved. On that date he and his former wife conveyed same to their daughter, Josie Shepherd, for the stated consideration of $200.00 and love and affection.

The deed conveys the fee, but without covenant of warranty, and subject to the limitations thus stated in the habendum clause:

“The said party of the second part to have and to hold said land 'to her and her heirs forever; but the parties of the first part retain the right to use and cultivate any part or all of said land…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Kentland Coal & Coke Co. v. KeenCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1916
  2. Board of Councilmen v. Capital Hotel Co.Court of Appeals of Kentucky · 1920
  3. Ramey v. RameyCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1922
  4. Francis v. Big Sandy Co.Court of Appeals of Kentucky · 1916
  5. Brock v. ConkwrightCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1918

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Smith v. City of KuttawaCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1928
  2. Metropolitan Park District v. Unknown Heirs of RigneyWashington Supreme Court · 1965
  3. METROPOLITAN PK. DIST. ETC. v. RigneyWashington Supreme Court · 1965

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API