Legal Opinion

Polk v. State

Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)

Decided January 30, 1986No. 05-85-00491-CRPublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WHITHAM, Justice.

Appellant appeals a conviction for murder. In his first ground of error, appellant contends that the trial court erred in admitting into evidence appellant’s confession because it was the fruit of an illegal arrest. We agree. We find no merit, however, in appellant’s challenge to the sufficiency of the evidence argued in his second and final ground of error. Accordingly, we reverse and remand.

Richard Franchett was murdered on November 4, 1984. Police officer Jones suspected appellant of the crime and, to continue the investigation, checked the police department computer.…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. Wong Sun v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  3. Mapp v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
  4. United States v. LeonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  5. Burks v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1978

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Polk v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1987
  2. Gene Allen Burks v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 2015
  3. Smith v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)1988
  4. Commonwealth v. MelilliSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1987
  5. Moffett v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)1986

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API