Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. Melilli

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided June 9, 1987No. 3147-3162PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WIEAND, Judge:

Presently before the Court for review in this consolidated appeal are orders of the trial court suppressing evidence obtained by the Commonwealth via pen registers and telephone intercepts, as well as physical evidence subsequently seized pursuant to warrant. The trial court’s suppression orders were based upon the absence of a neutral determination that probable cause existed for the use of pen registers.

In December, 1982, on the basis of information which had been provided by confidential informants, the Commonwealth began an investigation into illegal gambling operations in…

2Cases cited30 opinions

  1. United States v. LeonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Smith v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  3. Michigan v. TuckerSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  4. People v. BigelowNew York Court of Appeals · 1985
  5. Commonwealth v. CabezaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1983

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. MelilliSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1989
  2. Commonwealth v. SchaefferSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1987
  3. Commonwealth v. LemanskiSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1987
  4. State v. BrownConnecticut Appellate Court · 1988
  5. Commonwealth v. EdmundsSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1988

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API