Legal Opinion

State v. Serrell

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided October 19, 1972No. C 72-02-0466 CrPublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtThornton, J.

Defendant was convicted by a jury of illegal sale of narcotics, viz., heroin, in violation of former ORS 474.020 (repealed Oregon Laws 1971, ch 743, § 432).

On appeal he contends that the trial judge erred:(1) In denying his motion to dismiss for failure to grant him a speedy trial;(2) In failing to make provision for him to listen to his trial by use of sound equipment after he had been removed from the courtroom for allegedly disruptive conduct;(3) In instructing the jury that “[ejvery witness is presumed to speak the truth”;(4) In failing to instruct the jury that if the state presented…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Illinois v. AllenSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  2. State v. JorgensenCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1971
  3. State v. VernaCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1972
  4. State v. WinslowCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1970
  5. State v. KnissOregon Supreme Court · 1969

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. State v. SerrellOregon Supreme Court · 1973
  2. State v. VasquezOregon Supreme Court · 2004
  3. State v. ComishUtah Supreme Court · 1977
  4. State v. RichmondCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1977
  5. State v. GreeneCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1978

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API