Legal Opinion
Millennium Laboratories, Inc. v. Ameritox, Ltd.
District Court, D. Maryland
Decided January 18, 2013No. Civil Nos. L-10-3327, L-12-1753, L-12-1797PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM
BENSON EVERETT LEGG, Senior District Judge.
I. Introduction
This was a hard contested, but well contested, Lanham Act suit between two competitors in the urine drug testing (“UDT”) industry, Millennium Laboratories, Inc. (“Millennium”) and Ameritox, Ltd. (“Ameritox”). Each accused the other of false advertising. Midway through trial, after the Court had decided a number of claims, the parties, with the assistance of a United States Magistrate Judge, resolved the remaining issues by agreeing to a Consent Order. See Docket No. 321.
This resolution proved to be only a lull in the…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
- United States v. ITT Continental Baking Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1975
- PBM PRODUCTS, LLC v. Mead Johnson & Co.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2011
- C.B. Fleet Company, Incorporated, a Virginia Corporation v. Smithkline Beecham Consumer Healthcare, L.P., a Delaware Limited PartnershipCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1997
- American Science & Engineering, Inc. v. Autoclear, LLCDistrict Court, E.D. Virginia · 2008
3Cited by1 opinion
- Victory Global, LLC v. Fresh Bourbon, LLCDistrict Court, E.D. Kentucky · 2025