Mutual Lumber Co. v. Poe
District Court, W.D. Washington
1Opinion of the CourtCushman, District Judge
(after stating the facts as above).
The plaintiff contends: “* * * That the statutory period for assessment as extended by the waiver filed under section 278 (c) of the Revenue Act of 1924 [26 USCA § 106Q note], on November 14, 1925, expired *307December 31, 1926; that the Commissioner of Internal Revenue was not at any time prohibited from making- assessment of such deficiencies; and that there was no suspension of the running of the statute of limitations.”
Section 274, subdivision (d), 44 Slat, part 2, page 56 (title 26, USCA § 1048b), provides: “(d) The taxpayer shall at any time have the…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Mutual Lumber Co. v. PoeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1930
3Cited by2 opinions
- Mutual Lumber Co. v. PoeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1933
- Mutual Lumber Co. v. PoeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1933