Legal Opinion

Dana Sanderson v. Dun & Bradstreet, Inc.

District Court, N.D. California

Decided May 18, 2026No. 4:24-cv-06002Unknown

1Opinion

1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 7 DANA SANDERSON, Case No. 24-cv-06002-JST 8 Plaintiff, ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART DEFENDANT’S 9 v. MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT 10 DUN & BRADSTREET, INC., Re: ECF No. 42 Defendant. 11 12 13 Before the Court is Defendant Dun & Bradstreet, Inc.’s motion for summary judgment. 14 ECF No. 42. The Court will grant the motion in part and deny it in part. 15 I. BACKGROUND 16 Plaintiff Dana Sanderson alleges that Dun & Bradstreet unlawfully terminated him based 17 on age. He held various sales roles at D&B from…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  4. Guz v. Bechtel National, Inc.California Supreme Court · 2000
  5. Keenan v. AllanCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1996

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API