Legal Opinion

Sweet v. Parker

New Jersey Court of Chancery

Decided October 15, 1871PublishedCited by 8 opinions

The cause was argued on the pleadings and proofs, before the Vice-Chancellor, to whom it had been referred.

1Opinion of the Court

The Vice-Chahcéllob.

Erastus P. Sweet and wife, by deed of July 8th, 1858, conveyed to Charles Parker their homestead, in Trenton, for the consideration named in the deed of $900. On the 4th of October, 1862, Charles Parker died, leaving a will. After certain bequests, the will directs his property, personal and real, to be turned into money by Joel Parker, his son and executor, and held by him in trust for the other children of testator, to wit, Charles Parker and Mary Ann Glover, during their lives, and afterwards to their children, if any, on coming of age.

The bill is filed to have this…

2Cited by8 opinions

  1. First National Bank v. Department of Health & Mental HygieneCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1979
  2. Giberson v. First Nat. Bk., Spring LakeNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1927
  3. Kirkpatrick v. KirkpatrickNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1930
  4. Commercial Trust Co. of N.J. v. KohlNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1947
  5. Child v. WherryNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1937

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API