Legal Opinion
Indianapolis Life Insurance v. Aaron
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Decided March 14, 1924No. 23,665PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtHolt, J.
In overruling a demurrer to the complaint the court certified the question decided to be important and doubtful. Defendants appeal.
The complaint set out, in substance, that plaintiff is a life insurance company duly licensed to do business in this state; that, on September 15,1922, upon the written application of Harry Aaron, plaintiff issued a policy insuring his life for the benefit of his estate in the sum of $5,000; and that the application contained representations as to age, health, physical condition, other insurance, and the result of prior applications for insurance in other…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Mutual Life Insurance v. Hurni Packing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1923
- Wright v. Mutual Benefit Life Ass'nNew York Court of Appeals · 1890
- American Trust Co. v. Life InsuranceSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1917
- Jefferson Standard Life Ins. v. KeetonCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1923
- Ebner v. Ohio State Life InsuranceIndiana Court of Appeals · 1918
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Malanti v. Metropolitan Life InsuranceNew York Supreme Court · 1926
- Northwestern Mutual Life Insurance v. LaurySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1928
- Sovereign Camp, W. O. W. v. NallSupreme Court of Alabama · 1938
- Killian v. Metropolitan Life InsuranceNew York Supreme Court · 1928
- Mutual Life Ins. Co. of New York v. ConleyDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 1932