Malanti v. Metropolitan Life Insurance
New York Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtHagarty, J.
The action is brought by the beneficiary under a policy of insurance written by the defendant upon the life of plaintiff’s husband. The answer sets up fraud on the part of the insured *675in the application for the policy in concealing his physical condition. Plaintiff contends that this defense fails because of the fact that it is interposed after the expiration of two years specified in the “ incontestability clause ” of the policy. The policy was issued on the 4th day of March; 1924, the insured died on the 24th day of "August, 1925, and the action was started on the 12th day of April, 1926.…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Mutual Life Insurance v. Hurni Packing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1923
- Jefferson Standard Life Ins. v. McIntyreCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1923
- McCormack v. Security Mutual Life InsuranceNew York Court of Appeals · 1917
- Ramsey v. Old Colony Life InsuranceIllinois Supreme Court · 1921
- Mutual Life Ins. Co. of New York v. RoseDistrict Court, E.D. Kentucky · 1923
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Maslin v. Columbian Nat. Life Ins. Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1932
- Kocak v. Metropolitan Life InsuranceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1933
- Kocak v. Metropolitan Life InsuranceNew York Supreme Court · 1932
- Malnati v. Metropolitan Life InsuranceNew York Supreme Court · 1937