Legal Opinion

Hettinga v. United States

Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit

Decided April 3, 2009No. 07-5403PublishedCited by 27 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion for the Court by Circuit Judge ROGERS.

ROGERS, Circuit Judge:

Hein and Ellen Hettinga, owners of Sarah Farms, and co-owners with their son Gerben of GH Dairy, appeal the dismissal of their complaint challenging the constitutionality of two amendments to the Agricultural Marketing Agreement Act (“AMAA”). The Hettingas alleged that the amendments, which subjected certain large producer-handlers of milk to contribution requirements applicable to milk handlers, were invalid as a bill of attainder and a violation of equal protection and due process. The question on appeal is whether the…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Colorado River Water Conservation District v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  2. Weinberger v. SalfiSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  3. McCarthy v. MadiganSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
  4. Block v. Community Nutrition InstituteSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  5. Thunder Basin Coal Co. v. ReichSupreme Court of the United States · 1994

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by27 opinions

  1. Hettinga v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2012
  2. Island Creek Coal Co. v. Melyndia BryanCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2019
  3. Arkansas Dairy Cooperative Ass'n v. United States Department of AgricultureCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2009
  4. Jicarilla Apache Nation v. United States Department of the InteriorCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2010
  5. Blackmon-Malloy v. United States Capitol Police BoardCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2009

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API