Legal Opinion

Louisville, New Albany & Chicago Railway Co. v. Widman

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided February 2, 1894No. 950PublishedCited by 6 opinions

From, the Harrison Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the CourtDavis, C. J.

The transcript of the record on this appeal, also what is designated as “supersedeas brief,” were filed in the office of the clerk of the Supreme Court, who is ex officio the clerk of this court, section 1343, R. S. 1894, on the 31st of January, 1893.

The cause was submitted on the 6th of March.

On April 28, 1893, on application of counsel for appellant, the time given appellant to file its brief under the rules of this court was extended sixty days from May 4th, and on July 8th appellant filed a brief, and after-wards, on October 19th, filed «copies of printed brief.

On January 2, 1894,…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Louisville, New Albany & Chicago Railway Co. v. GranthamIndiana Supreme Court · 1885
  2. Murray v. WilliamsonIndiana Supreme Court · 1881

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Metropolitan Trust Co. of New York v. Toledo, St. L. & K. C. R.U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Indiana · 1901
  2. Island Coal Co. v. ClemmittIndiana Court of Appeals · 1895
  3. Citizens' Street Railroad v. Union Trust Co.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1898
  4. Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Railway Co. v. CoffinArizona Supreme Court · 1910
  5. Case v. Cleveland, Cincinnati, Chicago & St. Louis Railway Co.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1895

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API