Case v. Cleveland, Cincinnati, Chicago & St. Louis Railway Co.
Indiana Court of Appeals
From the Benton Circuit Court.
1Opinion of the CourtGavin, J.
The appellant sued appellee upon two limited-liability, live-stock contracts, alleging a failure *518upon appellee’s part to safely carry and deliver the property shipped. A general averment of performance upon the part of appellant is contained in the pleading. Appellee answered by a general denial. Upon the trial a special verdict was returned, upon which judgment was entered over appellant’s exception. The correctness of this action by the trial court is the first question for consideration.
The law is well settled that in order to justify a judgment in favor of the party upon whom rests the…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Express Co. v. CaldwellSupreme Court of the United States · 1875
- Westcott v. . FargoNew York Court of Appeals · 1875
- Evansville & Richmond Railroad v. MadduxIndiana Supreme Court · 1893
- Jennings v. Grand Trunk RailwayNew York Court of Appeals · 1891
- Pacific Express Co. v. Darnell Bros.Texas Supreme Court · 1884
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.