Legal Opinion

United States v. Papaioanu

District Court, D. Delaware

Decided September 14, 1950No. Cr. A. No. 689PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

LEAHY, Chief Judge.

These are motions under Rules 6(e) and 12(b) (2) of the Rules of Criminal Procedure, 18 U.SJC.A. The parties have asked the court to consider at this time merely the first rule as the second motion under 12(b) (2) is to be considered only in the event defendant’s motion under 6(e) would be granted. Before putting the question for decision, a reference should be had to the preliminaries. On July 11, 1949, the United States Commissioner held a hearing on a charge against defendant for income tax evasion. Defendant was held for the Grand *518Jury. Thereupon defendant immediately…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. In Re FriedCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1947
  2. United States v. GarssonDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1923
  3. United States v. American Medical Ass'nDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1939
  4. United States v. AlperCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1946
  5. McKinney v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1912

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Minton v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1959
  2. United States v. WolfsonDistrict Court, D. Delaware · 1968
  3. United States v. Ben Grunstein & Sons CompanyDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 1956
  4. United States v. GellerDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1957
  5. United States v. CrolichDistrict Court, S.D. Alabama · 1952

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API