Legal Opinion
Kopolow v. P.M. Holding Corp. (In re Modern Textile, Inc.)
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
Decided April 3, 1990No. Nos. 88-1609, 88-2604PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
CAMBRIDGE, District Judge.
Defendants P.M. Holding Corporation (P.M. Holding) and Continental Textile Corporation (Continental) appeal the district court’s judgment, enforcing certain guarantees P.M. Holding and Continental had made for the commercial lease obligations of Modern Textile, Inc. Plaintiffs A1 Kopo-low and A1 Kopolow Investments also cross-appeal the district court’s determination on attorneys’ fees and the court’s denial of their Rule 60(a) motion for clarification of judgment. For the reasons stated below, we affirm in part, reverse in part, and remand the matter for further…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Rhode Island Hospital Trust National Bank v. The Ohio Casualty Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1986
- Terminal Warehouses of St. Joseph, Inc. v. ReinersSupreme Court of Missouri · 1963
- Gates v. Central States Teamsters Pension FundCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1986
- Pelligreen v. Century Furniture & Appliance Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1975
- United States v. Joseph BurgerCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1984
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Matter of Continental Airlines, Inc.United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Delaware · 1992
- In Re Episode USA, Inc.United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. New York · 1996
- In Re Modern Textile, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1990
- Block Properties Co. v. American National InsuranceMissouri Court of Appeals · 1999
- In Re Fieldstone Mortgage Co.United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Maryland · 2010
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.