Legal Opinion · Dissent

222 East 12 Realty v. Yuk Kwan So

Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York

Decided January 10, 2017Published

1DissentLing-Cohan, J.

I respectfully dissent and vote to reverse, as landlord failed to establish that tenant breached the terms of the parties’ settlement stipulation. As recently stated by this court, “[s]trict enforcement of the parties’ stipulation ... is warranted [here] based upon the principle that the parties to a civil dispute are free to chart their own litigation course” (Trio 90 LLC v Williamson, 53 Misc 3d 149[A], 2016 NY Slip Op 51647[U], *1 [App Term, 1st Dept 2016], citing Mill Rock Plaza Assoc. v Lively, 224 AD2d 301 [1996]).

The stipulation at issue provides, in pertinent part:

“Without admitting the…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. W.W.W. Associates, Inc. v. GiancontieriNew York Court of Appeals · 1990
  2. Greenfield v. Philles Records, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 2002
  3. Two Guys v. S.F.R. Realty AssociatesNew York Court of Appeals · 1984
  4. Post v. 120 East End Avenue Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1984
  5. Hotel Cameron, Inc. v. PurcellAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2006

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API