Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

People v. Blankschein

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided March 10, 2003No. 2-01-0629, 2-01-1253 consPublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

PRESIDING JUSTICE HUTCHINSON

delivered the opinion of the court:

Defendants, Daniel Blankschein and Brittany S. Smith, appeal from the denials of their petitions to rescind the statutory summary suspensions of their driving privileges. In this consolidated appeal, defendants argue that their petitions should have been granted because they received inaccurate warnings before refusing to submit to breathalyzer tests. We affirm.

Defendants were arrested for driving under the influence of alcohol (DUI) (625 ILCS 5/11 — 501(a)(2) (West 2000)). The arresting officers read the defendants the “warning…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Eagan v. Chicago Transit AuthorityIllinois Supreme Court · 1994
  2. People v. GarriottAppellate Court of Illinois · 1993
  3. People v. MartinezIllinois Supreme Court · 1998
  4. People v. JohnsonIllinois Supreme Court · 2001
  5. People v. EngelbrechtAppellate Court of Illinois · 1992

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. West v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 2001
  2. People v. MannAppellate Court of Illinois · 2003
  3. People v. TomczakAppellate Court of Illinois · 2009
  4. People v. MannAppellate Court of Illinois · 2003
  5. People v. TomczakAppellate Court of Illinois · 2009

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API