Herbring v. Lee
Supreme Court of the United States
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Sanford
This case arose under the Insurance Law of Oregon. 2 Oregon Laws, Tit. 36, §§ 6322 to 6604. Section 6388 of this Law.provides, inter alia, as follows:(1) “It shall be unlawful for any fire insurance company doing business in the state of Oregon to write, place or cause tó be written or placed, any policy or contract for indemnity or insurance on property situated or located in the state of Oregon, except through or by the duly authorized agent or agents of such insurance company residing and doing business in this state, to' whom the premium on such insurance §hall be paid ... .”;(4) “Every…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Herbring v. LeeOregon Supreme Court · 1928
3Cited by17 opinions
- Mazer v. SteinSupreme Court of the United States · 1954
- Charleston Federal Savings & Loan Ass'n v. Alderson, State Tax Com'rSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- Massachusetts Indemnity & Life Insurance Co. v. Texas State Board of InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1985
- Flournoy v. WienerSupreme Court of the United States · 1944
- Charleston Federal Savings & Loan Ass'n v. AldersonSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.