Legal Opinion

Long v. Norriton Hydraulics, Inc.

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided June 27, 1995PublishedCited by 24 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HESTER, Judge:

We hold that the trial court improperly ruled that the plaintiff in this products liability action voluntarily proceeded to face a known and obvious risk in using the product thereby absolving the defendants from legal liability for his injuries. We therefore reverse the grant of summary judgment to defendants and remand for trial.

Appellant, Joseph Long, instituted this products liability action to recover for damages which he sustained when a hydraulic automotive lift suddenly shifted downward while he was working under the lift. 1 To avoid being struck by the device, appellant…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Carrender v. FittererSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1983
  2. Howell v. ClydeSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1993
  3. Kotovsky v. Ski Liberty Operating Corp.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1992

3Cited by24 opinions

  1. Hunger v. Grand Central SanitationSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1996
  2. Bullman v. GiuntoliSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2000
  3. Staub v. Toy Factory, Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2000
  4. Barrett v. Fredavid Builders, Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1996
  5. Struble v. Valley Forge Military AcademySuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1995

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API