Legal Opinion

(HC) Quintero v. Campbell

District Court, E.D. California

Decided January 8, 2024No. 1:23-cv-00174Unknown

1Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 JOEL QUINTERO, Case No. 1:23-cv-00174-JLT-SAB-HC 12 Petitioner, ORDER DENYING PETITIONER’S MOTION TO STAY 13 v. (ECF No. 19) 14 T. CAMPBELL, ORDER GRANTING PETITIONER 15 Respondent. EXTENSION OF TIME TO FILE TRAVERSE 16 17 Petitioner is a state prisoner proceeding pro se with a petition for writ of habeas corpus 18 pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. 19 I. 20 BACKGROUND 21 On February 1, 2023, Petitioner filed a federal petition for writ of habeas corpus in this 22 Court challenging his 2018 Kern County Superior…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Landis v. North American Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1936
  2. Fay v. NoiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  3. Bartlett v. StricklandSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  4. Virginian Railway Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1927
  5. Hoeun Yong v. Immigration and Naturalization Service,opinionCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2000

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API