Legal Opinion
Edme v. Tanenbaum
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided April 1, 2008PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
*625In an action, inter alia, to recover damages for legal malpractice, the defendant Richard Tanenbaum appeals, as limited by his brief, from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Schmidt, J.), dated March 21, 2007, as denied his motion pursuant to CPLR 3211 (a) (1) and (7) to dismiss the complaint insofar as asserted against him.
Ordered that the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from, with costs.
Contrary to the contention of the defendant Richard Tanenbaum, the documentary evidence that he submitted in support of his motion did not conclusively refute the plaintiff s…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Leon v. MartinezNew York Court of Appeals · 1994
- Rudolf v. Shayne, Dachs, Stanisci, Corker & SauerNew York Court of Appeals · 2007
- Nonnon v. City of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 2007
- AG Capital Funding Partners, L.P. v. State Street Bank & Trust Co.New York Court of Appeals · 2005
- Fresh Pond Road Associates v. Estate of SchachtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1986
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Viafax Corp. v. Citicorp Leasing, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2008
- Provident Bank v. GiannascaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2008
- Brown v. Astoria Federal SavingsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2008
- Denaro v. RosaliaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2009