Legal Opinion
Denaro v. Rosalia
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided February 17, 2009PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
*585In an action, inter alia, to recover damages for defamation, (1) the defendants Stephanie Rosalia and Salvatore Lipari appeal, as limited by their brief, from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Kerrigan, J.), entered December 20, 2007, as denied, in part, that branch of their motion which was for summary judgment dismissing the first cause of action to recover damages for defamation insofar as asserted against them, and denied that branch of their motion which was for summary judgment dismissing the fourth cause of action to recover damages for prima facie tort insofar…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Liberman v. GelsteinNew York Court of Appeals · 1992
- Burns Jackson Miller Summit & Spitzer v. LindnerNew York Court of Appeals · 1983
- Stukuls v. State of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1977
- Belsky v. LowenthalAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1978
- Belsky v. LowenthalNew York Court of Appeals · 1979
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- New York Telephone Co. v. Supervisor of Town of North HempsteadAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2010
- Barnaman v. New York City Health & Hospitals Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2011
- Liere v. ScullyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2010
- Edwards v. WalshAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2019
- Hersh v. CohenAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2024