Legal Opinion
Teresa Bartoszewska-Zajac v. Immigration and Naturalization Service
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
Decided January 12, 2001No. 99-4430PublishedCited by 16 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
MERRITT, Circuit Judge.
In this unfortunate immigration case, petitioner does not dispute that she is de-portable. She instead seeks suspension of deportation, a type of discretionary relief conditioned on, among other criteria, continuous presence in this country. The Board of Immigration Appeals found her ineligible because she could not show the requisite seven years’ stay. The Board calculated petitioner’s time in residence based upon immigration provisions enacted while her case was pending. Petitioner now contends that these legislative changes unconstitutionally deprived her of…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Landgraf v. USI Film ProductsSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- Mathews v. DiazSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Immigration & Naturalization Service v. Aguirre-AguirreSupreme Court of the United States · 1999
- United States Railroad Retirement Board v. FritzSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- Arevalo v. AshcroftCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2003
- Pierrot Bejjani v. Immigration and Naturalization Service John Ashcroft, Attorney General of the United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2001
- Riad Sad v. Immigration and Naturalization ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2001
- United States v. Algimantas M. DailideCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2003
- Ricardo Pacheco Suassuna v. Immigration and Naturalization ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2003
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.