Legal Opinion

Royal Insurance Co. v. Ward

Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976)

Decided February 9, 1934PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion op the Court by

Judge Dietzman

— Affirming in part and reversing in part.

On January 25, 1932, the appellee W. F. Ward insured his residence in Mayfield, Ky., with thq appellant which issued him a policy in the principal amount of $3,800, with a rider attached styled “Standard Mortgage Clause” in favor of the appellee Young Men’s Building & Loan Association, which at that time held a mortgage on this house and the lot upon which it was located. Among other things, this “standard mortgage clause rider” provided:

“Loss or damage, if any, under this policy shall be payable to Young Men’s…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Continental Insurance v. Vallandingham & GentryCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1903
  2. Collinsville Savings Society v. Boston InsuranceSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1905
  3. Harrington v. Fitchburg Mutual Fire InsuranceMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1878
  4. McKinney v. Western Assurance Co.Court of Appeals of Kentucky · 1895
  5. Hill v. International Indemnity Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1924

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Grange Mutual Casualty Co. v. Central Trust Co.Court of Appeals of Kentucky · 1989
  2. Rhode Island Insurance Co. v. WurtmanCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1936
  3. Farmers & Depositors Bank v. Commonwealth Ins.Court of Appeals of Kentucky · 1950

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API