Duhon v. United States
United States Court of Claims
1Opinion of the CourtKtjnzig, Judge
The question before us in this case is whether the failure of the Air Force Board for the Correction of Military Becords (AFBCMR) to change plaintiff’s record to reflect a return to a reserve commission status was arbitrary and capricious. We hold that it was.
*566Plaintiff served in both, enlisted and officer status in the Air Force during World War II. He was released to the inactive reserve and. was reactivated on August 6, 1951. At that time, 'his promotion list service date (PLSD) was determined to be November 2, 1949, to give him credit for the prior service. On April 15, 1961, plaintiff was…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Dismuke v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1936
- Reynolds v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1934
- Shapiro v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1947
- Caddington v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1959
- Friedman v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1958
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by27 opinions
- Sanders v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1979
- Skinner v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1979
- Yee v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1975
- Dehne v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1991
- Skaradowski v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1973
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.