Roehl v. Henck
Court of Appeals of Tennessee
1Opinion of the CourtSnodgrass, J.
These consolidated causes were each brought to enforce an alleged mechanic’s lien on the same property, on which a three-story brick building had been partially constructed in the City of Knoxville, on what is called Lots 7 and 8 of Central Market Company’s property, and which was more particularly described in the bill.
Complainants O. T. Roehl and H. A. Gervin, partners under the name and style of Roehl &' Gervin, filed the first bill 'against defendant Chas. L. Henck, the alleged owner, and later amended the same, making the other defendants, G. M„ Lewis, J. C. Jett and J. A. Plemmons,…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Murphy v. BearSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1913
- Bissenger v. Guiteman Bros.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1871
- Insurance Co. v. RailroadTennessee Supreme Court · 1896