Legal Opinion
Dr. Martin O. Miller v. Tennessee Gas Transmission Company
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
Decided March 22, 1955No. 15042_1PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
RIVES, Circuit Judge.
After the jury had rendered a verdict for the defendant, and the plaintiff had moved for a new trial, the trial court, with defendant’s consent but against plaintiff’s objection, entered a judgment against the defendant for the sum of Five Thousand Dollars and one-half of the costs of the court, and denied plaintiff’s motion for new trial. The plaintiff appealed, and the question to be decided is whether, under the facts of this case, the action of the trial court was erroneous under the teachings of Dimick v. Schiedt, 293 U.S. 474, 55 S.Ct. 296, 79 L.Ed. 603. The facts…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Dimick v. SchiedtSupreme Court of the United States · 1935
- Langnes v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1931
- Parsons v. Bedford, Breedlove, & RobesonSupreme Court of the United States · 1830
- Marsh v. Illinois Cent. R. Co.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1949
- Virginian Ry. Co. v. ArmentroutCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1948
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Alexander Silverman and Mrs. Ethel Silverman v. Travelers Insurance Company and David A. LarsonCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1960
- R. B. Company, Inc., and Nu Plastics, Inc. v. Aetna Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1962
- Roth v. BirdCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1956
- William Neil Hampton v. Magnolia Towing Company, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1964
- William Dennis Riggs v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1960
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.