Legal Opinion

Bernhart v. Industrial Commission

Court of Appeals of Arizona

Decided June 28, 2001No. 1 CA-IC-99-0136PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

FIDEL, Judge

¶ 1 The Industrial Commission of Arizona denied Claimant disability and medical compensation for three claims on the statutory grounds of “wilful self-exposure,” A.R.S. § 23-901.04, and “unreasonable refusal or neglect to submit to or follow any competent or reasonable surgical treatment or medical aid.” A.R.S. § 23-1027. Concluding that the Commission misapplied these statutes, we set its decision aside.

I. History

¶ 2 Claimant worked as a baker from 1961 until 1997, and for Respondent Employer Fry’s since 1974. Exposure to flour dust caused her to develop baker’s asthma.…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Rawlings v. ApodacaArizona Supreme Court · 1986
  2. Federal Land Bank of St. Paul v. Bismarck Lumber Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1941
  3. Joy P. Adams Roger D. Wensil v. Elizabeth H. Dole, Secretary of Labor, United States Department of Energy, IntervenorCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1991
  4. Serna v. Statewide Contractors, Inc.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 1967
  5. Professional Furniture Service v. Industrial CommissionCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1982

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. State v. RoqueArizona Supreme Court · 2006
  2. Microchip Technology Inc. v. StateCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2012

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API