State v. Duran
New Mexico Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
WOOD, Chief Judge.
Rudy Duran and Sadie Peralta were convicted of larceny of money exceeding $100.00 but less than $2,500.00. Section 40A-16-1, N.M.S.A.1953 (2d Repl. Vol. 6). Duran appeals, claiming his conviction is not supported by substantial evidence.
The larceny was a “till tap”; the money was taken from the cash drawer of a motel on North 4th Street in Albuquerque. The evidence is that Sadie Peralta took the money. Duran’s conviction is on the basis that he was an aider and abettor.
Duran was outside the motel holding Peralta’s baby. After leaving the motel Peralta went up to…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- State v. GonzalesNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1971
- State v. AtwoodNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1971
- State v. JohnsonNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1933
- State v. UrbanNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1974
- State v. ReedNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1951
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- State v. ScrogginsIdaho Supreme Court · 1986
- State v. BacaNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1974
- State v. DuncanNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1990
- State v. ReidIdaho Court of Appeals · 2011
- State v. BurrellNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1976
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.