Legal Opinion

Sanford Realty Co. v. City of Knoxville

Tennessee Supreme Court

Decided November 27, 1937PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice DeHaven

The above three suits involve identical questions. Petitioners are property owners and taxpayers of the City of ICnoxville. It appears that the respective properties of petitioners were assessed for taxation for the year 1936, on or prior to February 10, 1936, by the regular Tax Assessor of the City of Knoxville, and thereafter, on or about February 15, 1936, a new Tax Assessor, who had just come into office a few days before, increased the assessments of petitioners’ properties, as shown by the stipulations filed in the causes.

Petitioners duly filed with the Director of Finance, who is also…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Hickman v. WrightTennessee Supreme Court · 1918
  2. City of Knoxville v. FeldingTennessee Supreme Court · 1925
  3. National Life & Accident Ins. v. DempsterTennessee Supreme Court · 1935
  4. O'Neil v. StateTennessee Supreme Court · 1905
  5. First Nat. Bank of Fulton v. HowardTennessee Supreme Court · 1923

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Emory v. Memphis City Schools Board of EducationTennessee Supreme Court · 2017
  2. State Ex Rel. Chapdelaine v. TorrenceTennessee Supreme Court · 1976
  3. Holdredge v. City of ClevelandTennessee Supreme Court · 1966
  4. Home Builders Association of Middle Tennessee v. Williamson CountyTennessee Supreme Court · 2010
  5. Western Pipe Line Constructors, Inc. v. DickinsonTennessee Supreme Court · 1958

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API