Legal Opinion

O'Neil v. State

Tennessee Supreme Court

Decided September 15, 1905PublishedCited by 19 opinions

PROM HAMILTON. Appeal from the Criminal Court of Hamilton County. — M. M. Allison, Judge.

1Opinion of the CourtJustice M’Alister

The plaintiff in error tvas convicted of practicing medicine and surgery in the county of Hamilton without Raving first procured a certificate of license from the State board of medical examiners, as required by chapter 78, Acts of the general assembly of the State of ‘Tennessee, entitled “An act to regulate the practice of medicine and surgery in the State of Tennessee, and to define and punish offenses committed in violation of this act,” etc. Acts 1901, p. 115, c. 78.

The court thereupon assessed a fine of $25, together with the costs of the case, against the defendant, from ■which judgment…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Butchers' Benevolent Ass'n v. Crescent City Live-Stock Landing & Slaughter-House Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1873
  2. Ex Parte VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1880
  3. Holden v. HardySupreme Court of the United States · 1898
  4. Parks v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1902
  5. People v. PhippinMichigan Supreme Court · 1888

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Scopes v. StateTennessee Supreme Court · 1927
  2. Bass v. BarksdaleCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1984
  3. Phillips & Buttorff Mfg. Co. v. CarsonTennessee Supreme Court · 1949
  4. Smith v. PeopleSupreme Court of Colorado · 1911
  5. Locke v. Ionia Circuit JudgeMichigan Supreme Court · 1915

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API