Legal Opinion

Latham v. Hosch

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided July 8, 1921PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Appeal from the Circuit Court of the City of St. Louis.— Hon. Frank Landwehr, Judge. (1) That there is not sufficient evidence in said cause to raise an issue in behalf of respondent as to whether or not the automobile was being operated on the occasion in question by the man Jackson by or with the consent of, or under the direction of, this appellant, or for or in behalf of this appellant.

Read the full summary

Appeal from the Circuit Court of the City of St. Louis.— Hon. Frank Landwehr, Judge. (1) That there is not sufficient evidence in said cause to raise an issue in behalf of respondent as to whether or not the automobile was being operated on the occasion in question by the man Jackson by or with the consent of, or under the direction of, this appellant, or for or in behalf of this appellant. Guthrie v. Holmes, .272 Mo. 215. (2) The court erred in refusing to give a withdrawal instruction to the jury requested by the appellant, the respondent having asked only an instruction on the measure of…

1Opinion of the CourtDaues, J.

This is an action brought by plaintiff for damages on account of a collision between an auto mobile owned by tbe defendant and one owned by tbe plaintiff, in which collision it is alleged plaintiff’s machine was damaged. The collision occurred on November 7, 1917, at the intersection of Washington avenue and Whittier street in the city of St. Louis, and is the same accident involved in the personal injury suit of Ethel Pinteardd, Administratrix of the estate of Scott Pinteardd v. G. Carleton Hosch, No. 16,653, decided by this court at this term in an opinion not yet reported.

The allegations…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Guthrie v. HolmesSupreme Court of Missouri · 1917
  2. Kendrick v. RyusSupreme Court of Missouri · 1910
  3. Black v. EpsteinSupreme Court of Missouri · 1909
  4. Bingham v. GrahamCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1920
  5. State v. HarrisonSupreme Court of Missouri · 1915

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. International Travelers' Ass'n v. FrancisTexas Supreme Court · 1930
  2. Gaddy v. State Board of Registration for the Healing ArtsMissouri Court of Appeals · 1965
  3. Teel v. May Department Stores Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1943
  4. Ursch v. HeierMissouri Court of Appeals · 1922
  5. Bolivar Farmers Exchange v. EagonMissouri Court of Appeals · 1971

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API