Legal Opinion

Pioneer Chlor Alkali Co. Inc. v. Royal Indem. Co.

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided March 31, 1994No. A14-93-00391-CVPublishedCited by 35 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

ELLIS, Justice.

This is an appeal from a summary judgment granted in favor of Royal Indemnity Company (Royal), appellee, ordering that Pioneer Chlor Alkali Company, Inc. (Pioneer), appellant take nothing judgment from Royal. The primary dispute in the case concerns the interpretation of an insurance policy issued by Royal to Pioneer. Pioneer brings five points of error challenging the summary judgment. We affirm in part, reverse and render in part, and reverse and remand in part.

Pioneer produces chlorine, caustic soda, and muriatic acid at its plant in Henderson, Nevada. Pioneer…

2Cases cited31 opinions

  1. Nixon v. Mr. Property Management Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1985
  2. Gibbs v. General Motors CorporationTexas Supreme Court · 1970
  3. Montgomery v. KennedyTexas Supreme Court · 1984
  4. Forbau Ex Rel. Miller v. Aetna Life Insurance Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1994
  5. Arnold v. National County Mutual Fire Insurance Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1987

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by35 opinions

  1. Primrose Operating Co. v. National American InsuranceCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2004
  2. Canutillo Independent School District v. National Union Fire Insurance Co. of PittsburghCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1996
  3. Transcontinental Gas Pipeline Corp. v. Texaco, Inc., Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)2001
  4. Saint Paul Surplus Lines Ins. Co. v. Geo Pipe Co., Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)2000
  5. Mesa Operating Co. v. California Union Insurance Co., Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)1999

30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API