Legal Opinion

Mead v. McFadden

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided November 15, 1879PublishedCited by 6 opinions

From the Johnson Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the CourtFlow, C. J.

In this case the appellant sued the appellees to obtain a perpetual injunction. The appellees’ joint demurrer to the appellant’s complaint, for the alleged insufficiency of the facts therein to constitute a cause of action, was sustained by the court, and to this decision she excepted. She declined to amend her complaint, and judgment was rendered against her for the costs of suit, from which judgment this appeal is prosecuted.

In this court the appellant has assigned as error the sustaining of the appellees’ demurrer to her complaint, and this error presents for our decision the single…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Recker v. KilgoreIndiana Supreme Court · 1878

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Bishop v. MoormanIndiana Supreme Court · 1884
  2. Love v. BlairIndiana Supreme Court · 1880
  3. Warner v. WarnerIndiana Court of Appeals · 1903
  4. Quakenbush v. TaylorIndiana Supreme Court · 1882
  5. Fleming v. HendersonIndiana Supreme Court · 1890

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API