Legal Opinion

Heitman v. City of Mauston Common Council

Court of Appeals of Wisconsin

Decided April 29, 1999No. 98-3133Published

1Opinion of the Court

226 Wis.2d 542 (1999)

595 N.W.2d 450

Mark HEITMAN, on behalf of himself and 196 other qualified electors of the City of Mauston who signed a Direct Legislation Petition, Plaintiff-Appellant,[†]

v.

CITY OF MAUSTON COMMON COUNCIL, and City of Mauston, Defendants-Respondents.

No. 98-3133.

Court of Appeals of Wisconsin.

Submitted on briefs February 26, 1999.

Decided April 29, 1999.

On behalf of the plaintiff-appellant, the cause was submitted on the briefs of Matthew W. O'Neill and Jeremy P. Levinson of Friebert, Finerty & St. John, S. C. of Milwaukee.

On behalf of the defendants-respondents, the cause was…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Berman v. ParkerSupreme Court of the United States · 1954
  2. Associated Home Builders of Greater Eastbay, Inc. v. City of LivermoreCalifornia Supreme Court · 1976
  3. City of Eastlake v. Forest City Enterprises, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1976
  4. Fasano v. Board of County Com'rs of Washington Cty.Oregon Supreme Court · 1973
  5. Consolidated Rock Products Co. v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1962

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API